Reading
Edward Abbey’s novel The Monkey Wrench
Gang, throughout the course of the tale I definitely struggled with how to
take the actions of this Gang of eco-saboteurs fighting against the faceless
industrial powers they saw raping and pillaging the natural landscape they
loved so very much. The characters that Abbey created who commit these acts (Doc,
Bonnie, Smith, and most prominently Hayduke) considered the work that they were
doing to be definitively righteous; in that they were righting the wrongs that
humans have enacted against their natural habitat. It is interesting to note
also however, that the characters that oppose them (Bishop Love and his
cohorts) share the same self-righteous sentiments themselves. For these
characters the greatest good is serving the corporations, and ultimately
themselves, willfully ignorant of the negative repercussions their actions will
have on the nature they are exploiting. It seems to me personally that both
camp’s viewpoints however are far too totalitarian, as I believe Abbey was
attempting to illustrate within the novel the extremes on both sides for
ecological preservation as well as industrial and human expansion. It cannot be
so one-sided as Abbey has presented these polar opposites in his tale.
By
the end of the novel we also understand that this course of action cannot be
sustained. Both sides falter, as one by one each member of the Gang surrenders to
the fate of retribution and Bishop Love even falls to his own failing health
and aspirations that may have been literally too much for him to handle. Also,
although to the public it may have seemed that Hayduke was ultimately destroyed
by his own cause (by being cut down by gunfire in the landscape he was fighting
for), we know that in actuality he survived to fight another day. In this way
Hayduke became an eco-martyr, willing to sacrifice his body to the extreme (his
perceived death) for his Mother Earth, even if he wasn’t really willing to do
so in reality. Obviously, the forces at play in this novel are larger than the
lives of the actors; they surpass human terms in relation to scale and
duration. The planet Earth and these large corporations respectively are an
amalgamation of many interdependent and individual elements. Exploiting some
element or taking a jab at one portion of the whole may not do much damage but
this is definitive of the struggle; this is a battle for the future of both
entities, whose very existence is poised in opposition to one another.
Personally,
I do feel that the Monkey Wrench Gang did “work” that was justified because I
do not agree with the way that humans as a whole have come to maliciously
exploit not only our environment but also one another for monetary gain, snubbing
the destructive consequences of their actions in the process. With all of the
recent focus on climate change, exacerbated by new studies from NASA scientists
claiming essentially that “End is Nigh,” it would seem that if we do not do
something as a whole to change our current caustic practices our human race very
well may be doomed for destruction. The Earth is a much larger entity than we
are and we know it. In terms of its history, we only represent a blip on the
radar and this is a very sobering thought. Therefore, obviously I believe, property
destruction simply is not enough. These large corporate entities need to
realize that the way they are doing business is not sustainable and only
increasing our velocity toward the apparently impending doom that our
environment has in store for use. Karma’s a bitch, but that’s just the way it
is.
No comments:
Post a Comment